Anthropological Epoches: Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Anthropological Epoches : Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn. / Pedersen, Morten Axel.
In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 50, No. 6, 12.2020, p. 610-646.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Anthropological Epoches
T2 - Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn
AU - Pedersen, Morten Axel
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - This article has two objectives. In the first part, I present a critical overview of the extensive anthropological literature that may be deemed "phenomenological." Following this critique, which is built up around a classification into four different varieties of phenomenological anthropology, I discuss the relationship between phenomenological anthropology and the ontological turn (OT). Contrary to received wisdom within the anthropological discipline, I suggest that OT has several things in common with the phenomenological project. For the same reason, I argue, it is not accurate to posit OT and phenomenology as opposing or antagonistic projects, as they are often depicted among critics and advocates of OT alike. On the contrary, I go as far as suggesting, OT may be understood as one of the most concerted attempts anthropology has produced to realize a distinctly anthropological version of Husserl's method of phenomenological bracketing, namely what could be called the ontological epoche.
AB - This article has two objectives. In the first part, I present a critical overview of the extensive anthropological literature that may be deemed "phenomenological." Following this critique, which is built up around a classification into four different varieties of phenomenological anthropology, I discuss the relationship between phenomenological anthropology and the ontological turn (OT). Contrary to received wisdom within the anthropological discipline, I suggest that OT has several things in common with the phenomenological project. For the same reason, I argue, it is not accurate to posit OT and phenomenology as opposing or antagonistic projects, as they are often depicted among critics and advocates of OT alike. On the contrary, I go as far as suggesting, OT may be understood as one of the most concerted attempts anthropology has produced to realize a distinctly anthropological version of Husserl's method of phenomenological bracketing, namely what could be called the ontological epoche.
KW - phenomenological anthropology
KW - ontological turn
KW - epoche
KW - REFLECTIONS
KW - OUTLINE
KW - REALITY
KW - WORD
U2 - 10.1177/0048393120917969
DO - 10.1177/0048393120917969
M3 - Journal article
VL - 50
SP - 610
EP - 646
JO - Philosophy of the Social Sciences
JF - Philosophy of the Social Sciences
SN - 0048-3931
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 271538150