Anthropological Epoches: Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Anthropological Epoches : Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn. / Pedersen, Morten Axel.

In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 50, No. 6, 12.2020, p. 610-646.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Pedersen, MA 2020, 'Anthropological Epoches: Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 610-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393120917969

APA

Pedersen, M. A. (2020). Anthropological Epoches: Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50(6), 610-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393120917969

Vancouver

Pedersen MA. Anthropological Epoches: Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2020 Dec;50(6):610-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393120917969

Author

Pedersen, Morten Axel. / Anthropological Epoches : Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2020 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 610-646.

Bibtex

@article{1bf8743469f34274a1dc785c68e7b240,
title = "Anthropological Epoches: Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn",
abstract = "This article has two objectives. In the first part, I present a critical overview of the extensive anthropological literature that may be deemed {"}phenomenological.{"} Following this critique, which is built up around a classification into four different varieties of phenomenological anthropology, I discuss the relationship between phenomenological anthropology and the ontological turn (OT). Contrary to received wisdom within the anthropological discipline, I suggest that OT has several things in common with the phenomenological project. For the same reason, I argue, it is not accurate to posit OT and phenomenology as opposing or antagonistic projects, as they are often depicted among critics and advocates of OT alike. On the contrary, I go as far as suggesting, OT may be understood as one of the most concerted attempts anthropology has produced to realize a distinctly anthropological version of Husserl's method of phenomenological bracketing, namely what could be called the ontological epoche.",
keywords = "phenomenological anthropology, ontological turn, epoche, REFLECTIONS, OUTLINE, REALITY, WORD",
author = "Pedersen, {Morten Axel}",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1177/0048393120917969",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "610--646",
journal = "Philosophy of the Social Sciences",
issn = "0048-3931",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropological Epoches

T2 - Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn

AU - Pedersen, Morten Axel

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - This article has two objectives. In the first part, I present a critical overview of the extensive anthropological literature that may be deemed "phenomenological." Following this critique, which is built up around a classification into four different varieties of phenomenological anthropology, I discuss the relationship between phenomenological anthropology and the ontological turn (OT). Contrary to received wisdom within the anthropological discipline, I suggest that OT has several things in common with the phenomenological project. For the same reason, I argue, it is not accurate to posit OT and phenomenology as opposing or antagonistic projects, as they are often depicted among critics and advocates of OT alike. On the contrary, I go as far as suggesting, OT may be understood as one of the most concerted attempts anthropology has produced to realize a distinctly anthropological version of Husserl's method of phenomenological bracketing, namely what could be called the ontological epoche.

AB - This article has two objectives. In the first part, I present a critical overview of the extensive anthropological literature that may be deemed "phenomenological." Following this critique, which is built up around a classification into four different varieties of phenomenological anthropology, I discuss the relationship between phenomenological anthropology and the ontological turn (OT). Contrary to received wisdom within the anthropological discipline, I suggest that OT has several things in common with the phenomenological project. For the same reason, I argue, it is not accurate to posit OT and phenomenology as opposing or antagonistic projects, as they are often depicted among critics and advocates of OT alike. On the contrary, I go as far as suggesting, OT may be understood as one of the most concerted attempts anthropology has produced to realize a distinctly anthropological version of Husserl's method of phenomenological bracketing, namely what could be called the ontological epoche.

KW - phenomenological anthropology

KW - ontological turn

KW - epoche

KW - REFLECTIONS

KW - OUTLINE

KW - REALITY

KW - WORD

U2 - 10.1177/0048393120917969

DO - 10.1177/0048393120917969

M3 - Journal article

VL - 50

SP - 610

EP - 646

JO - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

JF - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

SN - 0048-3931

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 271538150