Public Voices in the Heavenly Chorus? Group Type Bias and Opinion Representation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Public Voices in the Heavenly Chorus? Group Type Bias and Opinion Representation. / Flöthe, Linda; Rasmussen, Anne.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 26, No. 19, 2019, p. 824-842.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Flöthe, L & Rasmussen, A 2019, 'Public Voices in the Heavenly Chorus? Group Type Bias and Opinion Representation', Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 26, no. 19, pp. 824-842. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1489418

APA

Flöthe, L., & Rasmussen, A. (2019). Public Voices in the Heavenly Chorus? Group Type Bias and Opinion Representation. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(19), 824-842. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1489418

Vancouver

Flöthe L, Rasmussen A. Public Voices in the Heavenly Chorus? Group Type Bias and Opinion Representation. Journal of European Public Policy. 2019;26(19):824-842. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1489418

Author

Flöthe, Linda ; Rasmussen, Anne. / Public Voices in the Heavenly Chorus? Group Type Bias and Opinion Representation. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 26, No. 19. pp. 824-842.

Bibtex

@article{c97ccee36c754572aadf48620315769a,
title = "Public Voices in the Heavenly Chorus?: Group Type Bias and Opinion Representation",
abstract = "While strong voices in the academic literature and real-world politics regard interest groups as biased representatives of the public, we know little about the scope and consequences of such biases for democratic governance. We conduct the first cross-national comparison of group and public preferences analyzing a new dataset of 50 issues in five West European countries. Despite the negative image of interest groups in politics, we find that their positions are in line with public opinion more than half the time. Moreover, while firms and business associations enjoy weaker support for their positions among citizens than public interest groups, they still enjoy the backing of a sizable share of the public. Additionally, we find no general pattern that communities with low interest group diversity are less likely to represent public opinion. Our findings have implications for democratic governance and discussions of how to conceptualize and measure biases in interest representation.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Interest groups, public opnion, public policy, representation, congruence",
author = "Linda Fl{\"o}the and Anne Rasmussen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2018.1489418",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "824--842",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "19",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public Voices in the Heavenly Chorus?

T2 - Group Type Bias and Opinion Representation

AU - Flöthe, Linda

AU - Rasmussen, Anne

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - While strong voices in the academic literature and real-world politics regard interest groups as biased representatives of the public, we know little about the scope and consequences of such biases for democratic governance. We conduct the first cross-national comparison of group and public preferences analyzing a new dataset of 50 issues in five West European countries. Despite the negative image of interest groups in politics, we find that their positions are in line with public opinion more than half the time. Moreover, while firms and business associations enjoy weaker support for their positions among citizens than public interest groups, they still enjoy the backing of a sizable share of the public. Additionally, we find no general pattern that communities with low interest group diversity are less likely to represent public opinion. Our findings have implications for democratic governance and discussions of how to conceptualize and measure biases in interest representation.

AB - While strong voices in the academic literature and real-world politics regard interest groups as biased representatives of the public, we know little about the scope and consequences of such biases for democratic governance. We conduct the first cross-national comparison of group and public preferences analyzing a new dataset of 50 issues in five West European countries. Despite the negative image of interest groups in politics, we find that their positions are in line with public opinion more than half the time. Moreover, while firms and business associations enjoy weaker support for their positions among citizens than public interest groups, they still enjoy the backing of a sizable share of the public. Additionally, we find no general pattern that communities with low interest group diversity are less likely to represent public opinion. Our findings have implications for democratic governance and discussions of how to conceptualize and measure biases in interest representation.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Interest groups

KW - public opnion

KW - public policy

KW - representation

KW - congruence

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2018.1489418

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2018.1489418

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 824

EP - 842

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 19

ER -

ID: 196699804