Thinking Assemblages Methodologically: Some Rules of Thumb

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

This chapter argues that the way that assemblage is employed as a loose metaphor almost deprives it of any theoretical meaning. In contrast, other intellectual projects claim that assemblage is more than a metaphor, it is a promising theoretical source of inspiration for developing new frameworks of research. In this chapter I argue that it is important to reflect on the different potentials of these projects. Contrary to Sassen, I argue for engaging in more depth with Deleuzian assemblage thinking. Against De Landa, I argue that formulating a consistent theory of assemblage and remaining on the philosophical level is misleading. Partaking with Collier and Ong, I argue that assemblage thinking implies an empiricist project, providing a parsimonious and open ontological vocabulary meaningful for conducting empirical research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReassembling International Theory : Assemblage Thinking and International Relations
EditorsMichele Acuto, Simon Curtis
Number of pages8
Place of PublicationBasingstoke
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK
Publication date2014
Edition1
Pages58-66
Chapter7
ISBN (Print)9781349480722, 9781137383952
ISBN (Electronic)9781137383969
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

ID: 209570428