Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture. / Weisdorf, Jacob Louis.

Museum Tusculanum, 2008.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

Weisdorf, JL 2008 'Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture' Museum Tusculanum.

APA

Weisdorf, J. L. (2008). Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture. Museum Tusculanum.

Vancouver

Weisdorf JL. Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture. Museum Tusculanum. 2008.

Author

Weisdorf, Jacob Louis. / Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture. Museum Tusculanum, 2008.

Bibtex

@techreport{e275f2405d6a11dd8d9f000ea68e967b,
title = "Why did the First Farmers Toil?: Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture",
abstract = "Time-budget studies done among contemporary primitive people suggest that the first farmers worked harder to attain subsistence than their foraging predecessors. This makes the adoption of agriculture in the Stone Age one of the major curiosities in human cultural history. Theories offered by economists and economic historians largely fail to capture work-intensification among early farmers. Attributing a key role to human metabolism, this study provides a simple framework for analysing the adoption of agriculture. It demonstrates how the additional output that farming offered could have lured people into agriculture, but that subsequent population increase would eventually have swallowed up its benefits, forcing early farmers into an irreversible trap, where they had to do more work to attain subsistence compared to their foraging ancestors. The framework draws attention to the fact that, if agriculture arose out of need, as some scholars have suggested, then this was because pre-historic foragers turned down agriculture in the first place. Estimates of population growth before and after farming, however, in light of the present framework seem to suggest that hunters were pulled rather than pushed into agriculture.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, hunting-gathering, Malthus, Neolithic revolution",
author = "Weisdorf, {Jacob Louis}",
note = "JEL classification: J22, Q56, O10",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
publisher = "Museum Tusculanum",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Museum Tusculanum",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Why did the First Farmers Toil?

T2 - Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture

AU - Weisdorf, Jacob Louis

N1 - JEL classification: J22, Q56, O10

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Time-budget studies done among contemporary primitive people suggest that the first farmers worked harder to attain subsistence than their foraging predecessors. This makes the adoption of agriculture in the Stone Age one of the major curiosities in human cultural history. Theories offered by economists and economic historians largely fail to capture work-intensification among early farmers. Attributing a key role to human metabolism, this study provides a simple framework for analysing the adoption of agriculture. It demonstrates how the additional output that farming offered could have lured people into agriculture, but that subsequent population increase would eventually have swallowed up its benefits, forcing early farmers into an irreversible trap, where they had to do more work to attain subsistence compared to their foraging ancestors. The framework draws attention to the fact that, if agriculture arose out of need, as some scholars have suggested, then this was because pre-historic foragers turned down agriculture in the first place. Estimates of population growth before and after farming, however, in light of the present framework seem to suggest that hunters were pulled rather than pushed into agriculture.

AB - Time-budget studies done among contemporary primitive people suggest that the first farmers worked harder to attain subsistence than their foraging predecessors. This makes the adoption of agriculture in the Stone Age one of the major curiosities in human cultural history. Theories offered by economists and economic historians largely fail to capture work-intensification among early farmers. Attributing a key role to human metabolism, this study provides a simple framework for analysing the adoption of agriculture. It demonstrates how the additional output that farming offered could have lured people into agriculture, but that subsequent population increase would eventually have swallowed up its benefits, forcing early farmers into an irreversible trap, where they had to do more work to attain subsistence compared to their foraging ancestors. The framework draws attention to the fact that, if agriculture arose out of need, as some scholars have suggested, then this was because pre-historic foragers turned down agriculture in the first place. Estimates of population growth before and after farming, however, in light of the present framework seem to suggest that hunters were pulled rather than pushed into agriculture.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - hunting-gathering

KW - Malthus

KW - Neolithic revolution

M3 - Working paper

BT - Why did the First Farmers Toil?

PB - Museum Tusculanum

ER -

ID: 5241755