Social engineering the local for peace

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Social engineering the local for peace. / Bräuchler, Birgit.

In: Social Anthropology, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2017, p. 437-453.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bräuchler, B 2017, 'Social engineering the local for peace', Social Anthropology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 437-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12453

APA

Bräuchler, B. (2017). Social engineering the local for peace. Social Anthropology, 25(4), 437-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12453

Vancouver

Bräuchler B. Social engineering the local for peace. Social Anthropology. 2017;25(4):437-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12453

Author

Bräuchler, Birgit. / Social engineering the local for peace. In: Social Anthropology. 2017 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 437-453.

Bibtex

@article{331cfcb340664881a0758d3040728fca,
title = "Social engineering the local for peace",
abstract = "Given the frequent failure of internationally established reconciliation tools, traditional conflict resolution mechanisms are increasingly integrated into transitional justice programmes in order to locally root peace. However, traditional justice mechanisms can be highly ambivalent; they can be, at the same time, inclusive and exclusionary, thus promoting peace or triggering new conflict. In Eastern Indonesia, where the author has conducted extensive field research, local actors took up these challenges and try to adapt local justice mechanisms so that they can cope with mass violence and the reintegration of conflict parties and society. Social engineering is promoted as one solution to the problem. This article looks at various conceptualisations and implications of social engineering – from a top-down authoritarian to a bottom-up participatory approach – and discusses how far this controversial concept and the deliberate adaption of local traditions to new challenges should be taken into account in future peace research and work as well as in anthropological debates.",
author = "Birgit Br{\"a}uchler",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/1469-8676.12453",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "25",
pages = "437--453",
journal = "Social Anthropology",
issn = "0964-0282",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social engineering the local for peace

AU - Bräuchler, Birgit

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Given the frequent failure of internationally established reconciliation tools, traditional conflict resolution mechanisms are increasingly integrated into transitional justice programmes in order to locally root peace. However, traditional justice mechanisms can be highly ambivalent; they can be, at the same time, inclusive and exclusionary, thus promoting peace or triggering new conflict. In Eastern Indonesia, where the author has conducted extensive field research, local actors took up these challenges and try to adapt local justice mechanisms so that they can cope with mass violence and the reintegration of conflict parties and society. Social engineering is promoted as one solution to the problem. This article looks at various conceptualisations and implications of social engineering – from a top-down authoritarian to a bottom-up participatory approach – and discusses how far this controversial concept and the deliberate adaption of local traditions to new challenges should be taken into account in future peace research and work as well as in anthropological debates.

AB - Given the frequent failure of internationally established reconciliation tools, traditional conflict resolution mechanisms are increasingly integrated into transitional justice programmes in order to locally root peace. However, traditional justice mechanisms can be highly ambivalent; they can be, at the same time, inclusive and exclusionary, thus promoting peace or triggering new conflict. In Eastern Indonesia, where the author has conducted extensive field research, local actors took up these challenges and try to adapt local justice mechanisms so that they can cope with mass violence and the reintegration of conflict parties and society. Social engineering is promoted as one solution to the problem. This article looks at various conceptualisations and implications of social engineering – from a top-down authoritarian to a bottom-up participatory approach – and discusses how far this controversial concept and the deliberate adaption of local traditions to new challenges should be taken into account in future peace research and work as well as in anthropological debates.

U2 - 10.1111/1469-8676.12453

DO - 10.1111/1469-8676.12453

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 25

SP - 437

EP - 453

JO - Social Anthropology

JF - Social Anthropology

SN - 0964-0282

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 269748133