Social engineering the local for peace
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Social engineering the local for peace. / Bräuchler, Birgit.
In: Social Anthropology, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2017, p. 437-453.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Social engineering the local for peace
AU - Bräuchler, Birgit
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Given the frequent failure of internationally established reconciliation tools, traditional conflict resolution mechanisms are increasingly integrated into transitional justice programmes in order to locally root peace. However, traditional justice mechanisms can be highly ambivalent; they can be, at the same time, inclusive and exclusionary, thus promoting peace or triggering new conflict. In Eastern Indonesia, where the author has conducted extensive field research, local actors took up these challenges and try to adapt local justice mechanisms so that they can cope with mass violence and the reintegration of conflict parties and society. Social engineering is promoted as one solution to the problem. This article looks at various conceptualisations and implications of social engineering – from a top-down authoritarian to a bottom-up participatory approach – and discusses how far this controversial concept and the deliberate adaption of local traditions to new challenges should be taken into account in future peace research and work as well as in anthropological debates.
AB - Given the frequent failure of internationally established reconciliation tools, traditional conflict resolution mechanisms are increasingly integrated into transitional justice programmes in order to locally root peace. However, traditional justice mechanisms can be highly ambivalent; they can be, at the same time, inclusive and exclusionary, thus promoting peace or triggering new conflict. In Eastern Indonesia, where the author has conducted extensive field research, local actors took up these challenges and try to adapt local justice mechanisms so that they can cope with mass violence and the reintegration of conflict parties and society. Social engineering is promoted as one solution to the problem. This article looks at various conceptualisations and implications of social engineering – from a top-down authoritarian to a bottom-up participatory approach – and discusses how far this controversial concept and the deliberate adaption of local traditions to new challenges should be taken into account in future peace research and work as well as in anthropological debates.
U2 - 10.1111/1469-8676.12453
DO - 10.1111/1469-8676.12453
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
VL - 25
SP - 437
EP - 453
JO - Social Anthropology
JF - Social Anthropology
SN - 0964-0282
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 269748133