Kuppel, CSS
Kuppel, CSS

Matti Weisdorf defends his PhD thesis at the Department of Anthropology

Candidate

Matti Weisdorf, Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen.

Title

For the Love of the Living
A Rubber-Boot Quest for the Biocene in Aarhus, Denmark

Supervisor

Associate Professor Cecilie Rubow, Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen

Committee

  • Associate Professor Kasper Tang Vangkilde, University of Copenhagen (chair)
  • Professor Matei Candea, University of Cambridge
  • Associate Professor Astrid Oberborbeck Andersen, Aalborg University

Host

  • Deputy Head of Collaboration, Associate Professor Stine Krøijer

Time and Place

Friday 28 October 2022, 2 PM

University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Social Sciences,
Gothersgade 140, 1123 Copenhagen K, Auditorium no. 1.

Reception:
After the defense, the Department will host a reception in the Ethnographic Exploratory in room 4.1.12, CSS.

Zoom

Topic: PhD Defence - Matti Weisdorf

Time: Oct 28, 2022 02:00 PM Copenhagen

 

Join Zoom Meeting

https://ucph-ku.zoom.us/j/67632498162?pwd=S0s0cDh0WVVKalY1Uk1adW5ja3VVUT09

 

Meeting ID: 676 3249 8162

Passcode: 020524

One tap mobile

+4532701206,,67632498162#,,,,*020524# Denmark

+4532713157,,67632498162#,,,,*020524# Denmark

 

Dial by your location

        +45 32 70 12 06 Denmark

        +45 32 71 31 57 Denmark

        +45 89 88 37 88 Denmark

        +39 020 066 7245 Italy

        +39 021 241 28 823 Italy

        +39 069 480 6488 Italy

        +33 1 7037 2246 France

        +33 1 7037 9729 France

        +33 1 8699 5831 France

        +49 695 050 2596 Germany

        +49 69 7104 9922 Germany

        +44 131 460 1196 United Kingdom

        +44 203 481 5237 United Kingdom

        +44 203 481 5240 United Kingdom

        +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)

        +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)

        +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)

        +1 470 250 9358 US (Atlanta)

        +1 470 381 2552 US (Atlanta)

        +1 602 753 0140 US (Phoenix)

        +1 646 518 9805 US (New York)

        +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)

        +1 651 372 8299 US (Minnesota)

        +1 669 219 2599 US (San Jose)

        +1 720 707 2699 US (Denver)

        +1 720 928 9299 US (Denver)

        +1 786 635 1003 US (Miami)

        +1 971 247 1195 US (Portland)

        +1 213 338 8477 US (Los Angeles)

        +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)

        +1 267 831 0333 US (Philadelphia)

Meeting ID: 676 3249 8162

Passcode: 020524

Find your local number: https://ucph-ku.zoom.us/u/c07AfeUGi

 

Join by SIP

67632498162@109.105.112.236

67632498162@109.105.112.235

 

Join by H.323

109.105.112.236

109.105.112.235

Meeting ID: 676 3249 8162

Passcode: 020524

Summary

This thesis examines the work and lives of a community of biodiversity-centered, rubber-boot oriented biology students and researchers at the Department of Bioscience at Aarhus University in Denmark. Based on long-term immersive fieldwork, it depicts practices and animations that are attuned to the earthly vulnerabilities of our time and at the same time permissive of lived enchantment and hopes for the future. It charts, in other words, how a love of the living turns into a quest for a world that is not just biodiverse, but where the bios as a whole, not the Anthropos alone, becomes the gravitational center of everything that humanity does and does not do. This vision is for the world is what I refer to in this thesis as the Biocene. The first part of the thesis concentrates on central elements of biological practice at the Aarhus University to explore how such practices implicate passions and condition relationships to the living world. The latter part shifts beyond the institutional confines of the university to focus on the ways that biology – at least of the rubber-booted sort – emerges as something like a calling

Chapter 1 examines taxonomic practices of classification and identification of species among biologists. It queries how such presumably detached approaches may bespeak care, and argues that classificatory exercises, apart from providing a grip on a diverse natural world, augment the lives of my interlocutors. Identifying a species by a name, I suggest, is not like putting a label on a container of rice. Nor is it only a constitutive operation of power. Rather, it makes particular species of bees, ants, or grasses present and manifest to biologists, thus enabling certain care-full relationships to the living world.

The second chapter exposes the ethicalities involved as biologists forfeit nonhuman life both in- and outside the laboratory. It demonstrates how biologists try on various legitimizing institutional logics, highlighting how such frameworks fail to address the full gamut of ethical becoming that is at stake. Ultimately, I suggest, violence and killing executed by biologists is realized in an ethically engaged mode of apology whereby biologists accede to the complexity of entangled multispecies relationships and take on responsibility for their actions in order to nurture the care-full potentials of responsivity.

Chapter 3 tackles the doing of biodiversity through a turning toward wild(er) nature in general and rewilding in particular. Taking the rewilding experiment at the Mols field laboratory as its point of departure, it argues that rewilding among biologists is articulated as an effective biodiversity management tool but also, importantly, that it presents a vision for the natural world that revolves around a decentering of Homo sapiens. This decentering, I argue, constitutes a condition of possibility for a detachment from pecuniary human interests which, biologists contend, ought to structure human relations to the rest of the living world if earthly flourishing is to be distributed more evenly across species – and if we are to properly appreciate the diversity of the bios on its own terms.

Chapter 4 reveals how such experiences of decentering are inhabited and lived by my biologist interlocutors. It depicts various encounters with life – with evolutionary theory, with sei whales and wolves – that leave biologists infatuated and ‘wonder’ed,’ and it suggests that such infatuation hinges crucially on the skills and wherewithal of rubber-boot biology.

The fifth and final chapter focuses on the flipside of such infatuation and begins with the grief and mourning that comes with the realization that one’s object of love is hurting and may soon cease to exist. I propose that these diverging affective responses coalesce in an incipient mobilization of biologists into various kinds of concerted interventions in favor of biodiversity. Zooming in on instances of conspicuously excited public biodiversity dissemination, I illustrate how my interlocutors seek to instill in the general public greater attention to and appreciation of the (often unloved parts of the) living world. I suggest that as they do this – as they become what I call machines of wonder and enchantment – enchantment is turned from a potential source of ethics to a form that ethics or politics might take.

The five chapters present distinct thematic loci and they demonstrate how biodiversity comes to matter to my interlocutors in ways that are 1) experientially augmenting, 2) ethically absorbing, 3) cosmologically unsettling, and 4) wonder-full. Indeed, I make the case that such forms of mattering fuel my interlocutors’ quest for a Biocene. Given our ecologically perilous times, vernacularized among other things as the sixth mass extinction, we might want to take notice.