Breastfeeding and infant care as ‘sexed’ care work: reconsideration of the three Rs to enable women’s rights, economic empowerment, nutrition and health

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Full Text

    Final published version, 783 KB, PDF document

  • Karleen D. Gribble
  • Julie P. Smith
  • Gammeltoft, Tine
  • Valerie Ulep
  • Penelope Van Esterik
  • Lyn Craig
  • Catherine Pereira-Kotze
  • Deepta Chopra
  • Adiatma Y.M. Siregar
  • Mohammad Hajizadeh
  • Roger Mathisen

Women’s1 lifelong health and nutrition status is intricately related to their reproductive history, including the number and spacing of their pregnancies and births, and for how long and how intensively they breastfeed their children. In turn, women’s reproductive biology is closely linked to their social roles and situation, including regarding economic disadvantage and disproportionate unpaid work. Recognizing, as well as reducing and redistributing women’s care and domestic work (known as the ‘Three Rs’), is an established framework for addressing women’s inequitable unpaid care work. However, the care work of breastfeeding presents a dilemma, and is even a divisive issue, for advocates of women’s empowerment, because reducing breastfeeding and replacing it with commercial milk formula risks harming women’s and children’s health. It is therefore necessary for the interaction between women’s reproductive biology and infant care role to be recognized in order to support women’s human rights and enable governments to implement economic, employment and other policies to empower women. In this paper, we argue that breastfeeding–like childbirth–is reproductive work that should not be reduced and cannot sensibly be directly redistributed to fathers or others. Rather, we contend that the Three Rs agenda should be reconceptualized to isolate breastfeeding as ‘sexed’ care work that should be supported rather than reduced with action taken to avoid undermining breastfeeding. This means that initiatives toward gender equality should be assessed against their impact on women’s ability to breastfeed. With this reconceptualization, adjustments are also needed to key global economic institutions and national statistical systems to appropriately recognize the value of this work. Additional structural supports such as maternity protection and childcare are needed to ensure that childbearing and breastfeeding do not disadvantage women amidst efforts to reduce gender pay gaps and gender economic inequality. Distinct policy interventions are also required to facilitate fathers’ engagement in enabling and supporting breastfeeding through sharing the other unpaid care work associated with parents’ time-consuming care responsibilities, for both infants and young children and related household work.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1181229
JournalFrontiers in Public Health
Volume11
Number of pages16
ISSN2296-2565
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Gribble, Smith, Gammeltoft, Ulep, Van Esterik, Craig, Pereira-Kotze, Chopra, Siregar, Hajizadeh and Mathisen.

    Research areas

  • breastfeeding, care economy, gender equality, maternal nutrition, maternity leave, maternity protection, national accounting

ID: 387372832