Defining 'Better': Investigating a New Framework to Understand Quality of Regulation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Defining 'Better' : Investigating a New Framework to Understand Quality of Regulation. / Pedersen, Morten Jarlbæk.

In: European Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.2017, p. 159-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Pedersen, MJ 2017, 'Defining 'Better': Investigating a New Framework to Understand Quality of Regulation', European Journal of Law Reform, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 159-178.

APA

Pedersen, M. J. (2017). Defining 'Better': Investigating a New Framework to Understand Quality of Regulation. European Journal of Law Reform, 18(2), 159-178.

Vancouver

Pedersen MJ. Defining 'Better': Investigating a New Framework to Understand Quality of Regulation. European Journal of Law Reform. 2017 Jan;18(2):159-178.

Author

Pedersen, Morten Jarlbæk. / Defining 'Better' : Investigating a New Framework to Understand Quality of Regulation. In: European Journal of Law Reform. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 159-178.

Bibtex

@article{dce0f68a85594de28de049151410eab2,
title = "Defining 'Better': Investigating a New Framework to Understand Quality of Regulation",
abstract = "Better regulation is a political and scholarly theme, which has gained in both relevance and salience throughout the last two decades or so. Regulatory quality is the epicentre of these discussions. Despite this quality is seldom conceptualised in its own right. Thus, beyond loose principles, we are rarely aware of what we mean by {\textquoteleft}better{\textquoteright} regulation, and academic discussions hereof usually centre themselves on other topics such as meta-regulation and processes. This leaves the notion of quality hard to asses especially from a comparative perspective. In this paper, a core concept of quality is suggested. This concept is founded on an acknowledgement of the importance of the legal texts when it comes to achieving regulatory aims and objectives. The concept and methodology proposed has components from both law and political science and is sought to be of relevance to scholars and practitioners alike.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Regulering, EU, Bedre regulering, Kvalitet, Tv{\ae}rfaglig",
author = "Pedersen, {Morten Jarlb{\ae}k}",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "159--178",
journal = "European Journal of Law Reform",
issn = "1387-2370",
publisher = "Eleven International Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining 'Better'

T2 - Investigating a New Framework to Understand Quality of Regulation

AU - Pedersen, Morten Jarlbæk

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Better regulation is a political and scholarly theme, which has gained in both relevance and salience throughout the last two decades or so. Regulatory quality is the epicentre of these discussions. Despite this quality is seldom conceptualised in its own right. Thus, beyond loose principles, we are rarely aware of what we mean by ‘better’ regulation, and academic discussions hereof usually centre themselves on other topics such as meta-regulation and processes. This leaves the notion of quality hard to asses especially from a comparative perspective. In this paper, a core concept of quality is suggested. This concept is founded on an acknowledgement of the importance of the legal texts when it comes to achieving regulatory aims and objectives. The concept and methodology proposed has components from both law and political science and is sought to be of relevance to scholars and practitioners alike.

AB - Better regulation is a political and scholarly theme, which has gained in both relevance and salience throughout the last two decades or so. Regulatory quality is the epicentre of these discussions. Despite this quality is seldom conceptualised in its own right. Thus, beyond loose principles, we are rarely aware of what we mean by ‘better’ regulation, and academic discussions hereof usually centre themselves on other topics such as meta-regulation and processes. This leaves the notion of quality hard to asses especially from a comparative perspective. In this paper, a core concept of quality is suggested. This concept is founded on an acknowledgement of the importance of the legal texts when it comes to achieving regulatory aims and objectives. The concept and methodology proposed has components from both law and political science and is sought to be of relevance to scholars and practitioners alike.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Regulering

KW - EU

KW - Bedre regulering

KW - Kvalitet

KW - Tværfaglig

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 159

EP - 178

JO - European Journal of Law Reform

JF - European Journal of Law Reform

SN - 1387-2370

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 161622690