Farveblinde følelser: Den retoriske marginalisering af den danske Black Lives Matter-bevægelse

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Farveblinde følelser : Den retoriske marginalisering af den danske Black Lives Matter-bevægelse. / Broberg, Frida Hviid.

In: Rhetorica Scandinavica, Vol. 27, No. 86, 2023, p. 46-65.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Broberg, FH 2023, 'Farveblinde følelser: Den retoriske marginalisering af den danske Black Lives Matter-bevægelse', Rhetorica Scandinavica, vol. 27, no. 86, pp. 46-65. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v27i86.300

APA

Broberg, F. H. (2023). Farveblinde følelser: Den retoriske marginalisering af den danske Black Lives Matter-bevægelse. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 27(86), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v27i86.300

Vancouver

Broberg FH. Farveblinde følelser: Den retoriske marginalisering af den danske Black Lives Matter-bevægelse. Rhetorica Scandinavica. 2023;27(86):46-65. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v27i86.300

Author

Broberg, Frida Hviid. / Farveblinde følelser : Den retoriske marginalisering af den danske Black Lives Matter-bevægelse. In: Rhetorica Scandinavica. 2023 ; Vol. 27, No. 86. pp. 46-65.

Bibtex

@article{7b5eb6549d7344d8860b76e6861b4f08,
title = "Farveblinde f{\o}lelser: Den retoriske marginalisering af den danske Black Lives Matter-bev{\ae}gelse",
abstract = "The article presents a rhetorical critique of the media covera-ge of the Danish Black Lives Matter movement in the summer of 2020,focusing on how emotions such as solidarity, anger and fear stick to themovement. While {\textquoteleft}solidarity with American victims of racism{\textquoteright} is framedas a legitimate affective orientation, the movement{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}angry rhetoric{\textquoteright}becomes a reason for rhetorical marginalization in the public debate.The media's emphasis on solidarity with American victims of racism as alegitimate affective orientation, as opposed to anger at racism in Den-mark, can be read as an example of color-blind racism, and prompts acritical discussion of a cultural and theoretical tendency to dismiss the'anger of social movements' as destructive and counterproductive. Thearticle is a contribution to understanding how emotions participate inmarginalizing social movements in the public debate.",
keywords = "Det Humanistiske Fakultet, affect, rhetorical marginalization, anti-racist activism, emotion, social movements, Black Lives Matter",
author = "Broberg, {Frida Hviid}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.52610/rhs.v27i86.300",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "27",
pages = "46--65",
journal = "Rhetorica Scandinavica",
issn = "1397-0534",
publisher = "Retorikf{\"o}rlaget AB ",
number = "86",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Farveblinde følelser

T2 - Den retoriske marginalisering af den danske Black Lives Matter-bevægelse

AU - Broberg, Frida Hviid

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The article presents a rhetorical critique of the media covera-ge of the Danish Black Lives Matter movement in the summer of 2020,focusing on how emotions such as solidarity, anger and fear stick to themovement. While ‘solidarity with American victims of racism’ is framedas a legitimate affective orientation, the movement’s ‘angry rhetoric’becomes a reason for rhetorical marginalization in the public debate.The media's emphasis on solidarity with American victims of racism as alegitimate affective orientation, as opposed to anger at racism in Den-mark, can be read as an example of color-blind racism, and prompts acritical discussion of a cultural and theoretical tendency to dismiss the'anger of social movements' as destructive and counterproductive. Thearticle is a contribution to understanding how emotions participate inmarginalizing social movements in the public debate.

AB - The article presents a rhetorical critique of the media covera-ge of the Danish Black Lives Matter movement in the summer of 2020,focusing on how emotions such as solidarity, anger and fear stick to themovement. While ‘solidarity with American victims of racism’ is framedas a legitimate affective orientation, the movement’s ‘angry rhetoric’becomes a reason for rhetorical marginalization in the public debate.The media's emphasis on solidarity with American victims of racism as alegitimate affective orientation, as opposed to anger at racism in Den-mark, can be read as an example of color-blind racism, and prompts acritical discussion of a cultural and theoretical tendency to dismiss the'anger of social movements' as destructive and counterproductive. Thearticle is a contribution to understanding how emotions participate inmarginalizing social movements in the public debate.

KW - Det Humanistiske Fakultet

KW - affect

KW - rhetorical marginalization

KW - anti-racist activism

KW - emotion

KW - social movements

KW - Black Lives Matter

U2 - 10.52610/rhs.v27i86.300

DO - 10.52610/rhs.v27i86.300

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 27

SP - 46

EP - 65

JO - Rhetorica Scandinavica

JF - Rhetorica Scandinavica

SN - 1397-0534

IS - 86

ER -

ID: 367479323