TY - RPRT

T1 - General public’s privacy concerns regarding drone use in residential and public areas 

T2 - Empirical research report, May 2017

AU - Bajde, Domen

AU - Bruun, Maja Hojer

AU - Sommer, Jannek K.

AU - Waltorp, Karen

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This report summarises the work conducted during the first phase of a collaborative project between the University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Aalborg university (AAU) and the Danish transport, construction and housing authority (TBST).The main research goals were to gain insight into: 1) the public’s knowledge and attitudes towards drones, 2) the public’s privacy concerns regarding drone use in residential and public areas and 3) the public’s viewpoints on drone regulation. The report provides an overview of the work process and the main results of six focus group interviews. For the purpose of this report, the word ‘drone’ refers to partly autonomous flying vehicles, used for non-military purposes (i.e. civic or commercial drones).Currently, there is limited empirical research that would indicate what kind of concerns citizens have, how intense these concerns are and how they might differ across different contexts. Answers to these questions are of the utmost importance in developing regulatory frameworks that would respect the public's concerns, while also allowing private companies, public organisations and drone hobbyists to enjoy the benefits of drone technology. While privacy risks associated with modern technologies tend to be less visible to citizens (e.g. capture and flow of online data), drones represent visible and audible machines. When confronted with a drone, people may feel threatened and observed, regardless of whether that is actually the case. Therefore, drones may well cause a fundamental shift in the public's understanding of privacy concerns in relation to modern technology.

AB - This report summarises the work conducted during the first phase of a collaborative project between the University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Aalborg university (AAU) and the Danish transport, construction and housing authority (TBST).The main research goals were to gain insight into: 1) the public’s knowledge and attitudes towards drones, 2) the public’s privacy concerns regarding drone use in residential and public areas and 3) the public’s viewpoints on drone regulation. The report provides an overview of the work process and the main results of six focus group interviews. For the purpose of this report, the word ‘drone’ refers to partly autonomous flying vehicles, used for non-military purposes (i.e. civic or commercial drones).Currently, there is limited empirical research that would indicate what kind of concerns citizens have, how intense these concerns are and how they might differ across different contexts. Answers to these questions are of the utmost importance in developing regulatory frameworks that would respect the public's concerns, while also allowing private companies, public organisations and drone hobbyists to enjoy the benefits of drone technology. While privacy risks associated with modern technologies tend to be less visible to citizens (e.g. capture and flow of online data), drones represent visible and audible machines. When confronted with a drone, people may feel threatened and observed, regardless of whether that is actually the case. Therefore, drones may well cause a fundamental shift in the public's understanding of privacy concerns in relation to modern technology.

UR - https://www.sdu.dk/da/aktuelt/nyt_fra_sdu/droner_og_privatliv

M3 - Report

BT - General public’s privacy concerns regarding drone use in residential and public areas 

PB - Syddansk Universitet

ER -