Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement. / Niño-Zarazúa , Miguel ; Roope, Laurence; Tarp, Finn.

Helsinki : UNU-WIDER, 2014.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

Niño-Zarazúa , M, Roope, L & Tarp, F 2014 'Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement' UNU-WIDER, Helsinki. <https://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2014/en_GB/wp2014-004/>

APA

Niño-Zarazúa , M., Roope, L., & Tarp, F. (2014). Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement. UNU-WIDER. WIDER Working Paper Vol. 2014 No. 004 https://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2014/en_GB/wp2014-004/

Vancouver

Niño-Zarazúa M, Roope L, Tarp F. Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER. 2014 Jan.

Author

Niño-Zarazúa , Miguel ; Roope, Laurence ; Tarp, Finn. / Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement. Helsinki : UNU-WIDER, 2014. (WIDER Working Paper; No. 004, Vol. 2014).

Bibtex

@techreport{7a7c9ce0e8ef489d93306a88d99e4711,
title = "Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement",
abstract = "This paper discusses different approaches to the measurement of global interpersonal in equality. Trends in global interpersonal inequality during 1975-2005 are measured using data from UNU-WIDER{\textquoteright}s World Income Inequality Database. In order to better understand the trends, global interpersonal inequality is decomposed into within-country and between-country inequality. The paper illustrates that the relationship between global interpersonal inequality and these constituent components is a complex one. In particular, we demonstrate that the changes in China{\textquoteright}s and India{\textquoteright}s income distributions over the past 30 years have simultaneously caused inequality to rise domestically in those countries, while tending to reduce global inter-personal inequality. In light of these findings, we reflect on the meaning and policy relevance of global vis-{\`a}-vis domestic inequality measures",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, global interpersonal inequality, inequality, inequality measurement",
author = "Miguel Ni{\~n}o-Zaraz{\'u}a and Laurence Roope and Finn Tarp",
note = "JEL classification: D31, D63, E01, O15",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
language = "English",
series = "WIDER Working Paper",
number = "004",
publisher = "UNU-WIDER",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "UNU-WIDER",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement

AU - Niño-Zarazúa , Miguel

AU - Roope, Laurence

AU - Tarp, Finn

N1 - JEL classification: D31, D63, E01, O15

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - This paper discusses different approaches to the measurement of global interpersonal in equality. Trends in global interpersonal inequality during 1975-2005 are measured using data from UNU-WIDER’s World Income Inequality Database. In order to better understand the trends, global interpersonal inequality is decomposed into within-country and between-country inequality. The paper illustrates that the relationship between global interpersonal inequality and these constituent components is a complex one. In particular, we demonstrate that the changes in China’s and India’s income distributions over the past 30 years have simultaneously caused inequality to rise domestically in those countries, while tending to reduce global inter-personal inequality. In light of these findings, we reflect on the meaning and policy relevance of global vis-à-vis domestic inequality measures

AB - This paper discusses different approaches to the measurement of global interpersonal in equality. Trends in global interpersonal inequality during 1975-2005 are measured using data from UNU-WIDER’s World Income Inequality Database. In order to better understand the trends, global interpersonal inequality is decomposed into within-country and between-country inequality. The paper illustrates that the relationship between global interpersonal inequality and these constituent components is a complex one. In particular, we demonstrate that the changes in China’s and India’s income distributions over the past 30 years have simultaneously caused inequality to rise domestically in those countries, while tending to reduce global inter-personal inequality. In light of these findings, we reflect on the meaning and policy relevance of global vis-à-vis domestic inequality measures

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - global interpersonal inequality

KW - inequality

KW - inequality measurement

M3 - Working paper

T3 - WIDER Working Paper

BT - Global interpersonal inequality: Trends and measurement

PB - UNU-WIDER

CY - Helsinki

ER -

ID: 103037637