Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Pathways to practice : praxiography and international politics. / Bueger, Christian.

In: European Political Science Review, Vol. 6, No. 03, 01.08.2014, p. 383-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bueger, C 2014, 'Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics', European Political Science Review, vol. 6, no. 03, pp. 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000167

APA

Bueger, C. (2014). Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics. European Political Science Review, 6(03), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000167

Vancouver

Bueger C. Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics. European Political Science Review. 2014 Aug 1;6(03):383-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000167

Author

Bueger, Christian. / Pathways to practice : praxiography and international politics. In: European Political Science Review. 2014 ; Vol. 6, No. 03. pp. 383-406.

Bibtex

@article{073a1c0de5274e198e7d00397c3978ce,
title = "Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics",
abstract = "Political scientists have started to focus on 'practice' as the smallest unit of analysis. Following a broader turn in the social sciences, the practice focus provides multiple advantages, including better conceptualizations of short-term social change, getting closer to the everyday activities of those speaking, writing and doing politics, appropriate conceptualization of agency-structure dynamics, or forms of analysis resonating with other communities than scholarly ones. This contribution asks what the methodological implications of the practice turn are. It is argued that the practice focus does not only imply a certain 'theory' but also a certain methodology. I advance the term praxiography to speak about the forms of analysis produced by practice researchers. I discuss key guidelines of praxiographic research on two levels: first, general research strategies that provide empirical access points, second, guidelines for data collection in the frame of participant observation, expert interviews, and document analysis. I conclude in arguing that although praxiography is context driven, and hence requires to be tailored to the research problem, it is vital to reflect on the methodological repertoire of praxiographic research",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Methodology, practice theory, research strategy, sites, participant observation",
author = "Christian Bueger",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1755773913000167",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "383--406",
journal = "European Political Science Review",
issn = "1755-7739",
publisher = "cambridge university press (cup)",
number = "03",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathways to practice

T2 - praxiography and international politics

AU - Bueger, Christian

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - Political scientists have started to focus on 'practice' as the smallest unit of analysis. Following a broader turn in the social sciences, the practice focus provides multiple advantages, including better conceptualizations of short-term social change, getting closer to the everyday activities of those speaking, writing and doing politics, appropriate conceptualization of agency-structure dynamics, or forms of analysis resonating with other communities than scholarly ones. This contribution asks what the methodological implications of the practice turn are. It is argued that the practice focus does not only imply a certain 'theory' but also a certain methodology. I advance the term praxiography to speak about the forms of analysis produced by practice researchers. I discuss key guidelines of praxiographic research on two levels: first, general research strategies that provide empirical access points, second, guidelines for data collection in the frame of participant observation, expert interviews, and document analysis. I conclude in arguing that although praxiography is context driven, and hence requires to be tailored to the research problem, it is vital to reflect on the methodological repertoire of praxiographic research

AB - Political scientists have started to focus on 'practice' as the smallest unit of analysis. Following a broader turn in the social sciences, the practice focus provides multiple advantages, including better conceptualizations of short-term social change, getting closer to the everyday activities of those speaking, writing and doing politics, appropriate conceptualization of agency-structure dynamics, or forms of analysis resonating with other communities than scholarly ones. This contribution asks what the methodological implications of the practice turn are. It is argued that the practice focus does not only imply a certain 'theory' but also a certain methodology. I advance the term praxiography to speak about the forms of analysis produced by practice researchers. I discuss key guidelines of praxiographic research on two levels: first, general research strategies that provide empirical access points, second, guidelines for data collection in the frame of participant observation, expert interviews, and document analysis. I conclude in arguing that although praxiography is context driven, and hence requires to be tailored to the research problem, it is vital to reflect on the methodological repertoire of praxiographic research

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Methodology

KW - practice theory

KW - research strategy

KW - sites

KW - participant observation

U2 - 10.1017/S1755773913000167

DO - 10.1017/S1755773913000167

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 383

EP - 406

JO - European Political Science Review

JF - European Political Science Review

SN - 1755-7739

IS - 03

ER -

ID: 208973547