The Intimate Relationship Between Security, Effectiveness and Legitimacy: A New Look at the Schengen Compensatory Measures

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

The Intimate Relationship Between Security, Effectiveness and Legitimacy : A New Look at the Schengen Compensatory Measures. / Pedersen, Morten Jarlbæk.

In: European Security, Vol. 24, No. 4, 10.2015, p. 541-559.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Pedersen, MJ 2015, 'The Intimate Relationship Between Security, Effectiveness and Legitimacy: A New Look at the Schengen Compensatory Measures', European Security, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2015.1014808

APA

Pedersen, M. J. (2015). The Intimate Relationship Between Security, Effectiveness and Legitimacy: A New Look at the Schengen Compensatory Measures. European Security, 24(4), 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2015.1014808

Vancouver

Pedersen MJ. The Intimate Relationship Between Security, Effectiveness and Legitimacy: A New Look at the Schengen Compensatory Measures. European Security. 2015 Oct;24(4):541-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2015.1014808

Author

Pedersen, Morten Jarlbæk. / The Intimate Relationship Between Security, Effectiveness and Legitimacy : A New Look at the Schengen Compensatory Measures. In: European Security. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 541-559.

Bibtex

@article{1d2468c2b9ff477c94a4e7adbee4f87e,
title = "The Intimate Relationship Between Security, Effectiveness and Legitimacy: A New Look at the Schengen Compensatory Measures",
abstract = "The so-called Schengen compensatory measures such as the Schengen Information System (SIS) or the European Dactylographic System (Eurodac) have been the centre of much attention. However, the research on these security measures has focused almost solely on their effect on liberty, human rights, and the like. Not much attention has been given to the actual effectiveness of the security remedies taken in the European Union (EU) to compensate for the abolition of border controls, despite effectiveness being an obvious source of legitimacy in the realm of security. This article takes a first step in the direction of correcting this neglect and develops the foundations for an analytical framework focusing on effectiveness and legitimacy. The framework is illustrated through a minor analysis of the legal and institutional set-up of SIS and Eurodac as examples pointing to sources of ineffectiveness in the very set-up of the databases.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, European Union, security, legitimacy, effectiveness, output, SIS , Eurodac",
author = "Pedersen, {Morten Jarlb{\ae}k}",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1080/09662839.2015.1014808",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "541--559",
journal = "European Security",
issn = "0966-2839",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Intimate Relationship Between Security, Effectiveness and Legitimacy

T2 - A New Look at the Schengen Compensatory Measures

AU - Pedersen, Morten Jarlbæk

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - The so-called Schengen compensatory measures such as the Schengen Information System (SIS) or the European Dactylographic System (Eurodac) have been the centre of much attention. However, the research on these security measures has focused almost solely on their effect on liberty, human rights, and the like. Not much attention has been given to the actual effectiveness of the security remedies taken in the European Union (EU) to compensate for the abolition of border controls, despite effectiveness being an obvious source of legitimacy in the realm of security. This article takes a first step in the direction of correcting this neglect and develops the foundations for an analytical framework focusing on effectiveness and legitimacy. The framework is illustrated through a minor analysis of the legal and institutional set-up of SIS and Eurodac as examples pointing to sources of ineffectiveness in the very set-up of the databases.

AB - The so-called Schengen compensatory measures such as the Schengen Information System (SIS) or the European Dactylographic System (Eurodac) have been the centre of much attention. However, the research on these security measures has focused almost solely on their effect on liberty, human rights, and the like. Not much attention has been given to the actual effectiveness of the security remedies taken in the European Union (EU) to compensate for the abolition of border controls, despite effectiveness being an obvious source of legitimacy in the realm of security. This article takes a first step in the direction of correcting this neglect and develops the foundations for an analytical framework focusing on effectiveness and legitimacy. The framework is illustrated through a minor analysis of the legal and institutional set-up of SIS and Eurodac as examples pointing to sources of ineffectiveness in the very set-up of the databases.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - European Union

KW - security

KW - legitimacy

KW - effectiveness

KW - output

KW - SIS

KW - Eurodac

U2 - 10.1080/09662839.2015.1014808

DO - 10.1080/09662839.2015.1014808

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 541

EP - 559

JO - European Security

JF - European Security

SN - 0966-2839

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 130758331