Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones: A Systematic Review

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones : A Systematic Review. / Beckmann, Nicholas A; Mueller, Sebastian; Gondan, Matthias; Jaeger, Sebastian; Reiner, Tobias; Bitsch, Rudi G.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2015, p. 249–253.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Beckmann, NA, Mueller, S, Gondan, M, Jaeger, S, Reiner, T & Bitsch, RG 2015, 'Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones: A Systematic Review', Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016

APA

Beckmann, N. A., Mueller, S., Gondan, M., Jaeger, S., Reiner, T., & Bitsch, R. G. (2015). Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones: A Systematic Review. Journal of Arthroplasty, 30(2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016

Vancouver

Beckmann NA, Mueller S, Gondan M, Jaeger S, Reiner T, Bitsch RG. Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones: A Systematic Review. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015;30(2):249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016

Author

Beckmann, Nicholas A ; Mueller, Sebastian ; Gondan, Matthias ; Jaeger, Sebastian ; Reiner, Tobias ; Bitsch, Rudi G. / Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones : A Systematic Review. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 249–253.

Bibtex

@article{698225dba0f0408086f40ed8a4779f7d,
title = "Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Aseptic loosening and focal osteolysis are the most common reasons for knee arthroplasty failure. The best treatment remains unclear. We reviewed the literature on the treatment of revision knee arthroplasty using bony structural allografts (476 cases) and porous metal cones (223 cases) to determine if a difference in the revision failure rates was discernable. The failure rates were compared using a logistic regression model with adjustment for discrepancies in FU time and number of grafts used (femoral, tibial, or both). In this analysis, the porous implant shows a significantly decreased loosening rate in AORI 2 and 3 defects. The overall failure rate was also substantially lower in the porous metal group than the structural allograft group; little difference in the infection rates was noted.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, allograft , porous metal, tantalum, knee revision arthroplasty, AORI, knee defects",
author = "Beckmann, {Nicholas A} and Sebastian Mueller and Matthias Gondan and Sebastian Jaeger and Tobias Reiner and Bitsch, {Rudi G}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "249–253",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Beckmann, Nicholas A

AU - Mueller, Sebastian

AU - Gondan, Matthias

AU - Jaeger, Sebastian

AU - Reiner, Tobias

AU - Bitsch, Rudi G

N1 - Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Aseptic loosening and focal osteolysis are the most common reasons for knee arthroplasty failure. The best treatment remains unclear. We reviewed the literature on the treatment of revision knee arthroplasty using bony structural allografts (476 cases) and porous metal cones (223 cases) to determine if a difference in the revision failure rates was discernable. The failure rates were compared using a logistic regression model with adjustment for discrepancies in FU time and number of grafts used (femoral, tibial, or both). In this analysis, the porous implant shows a significantly decreased loosening rate in AORI 2 and 3 defects. The overall failure rate was also substantially lower in the porous metal group than the structural allograft group; little difference in the infection rates was noted.

AB - Aseptic loosening and focal osteolysis are the most common reasons for knee arthroplasty failure. The best treatment remains unclear. We reviewed the literature on the treatment of revision knee arthroplasty using bony structural allografts (476 cases) and porous metal cones (223 cases) to determine if a difference in the revision failure rates was discernable. The failure rates were compared using a logistic regression model with adjustment for discrepancies in FU time and number of grafts used (femoral, tibial, or both). In this analysis, the porous implant shows a significantly decreased loosening rate in AORI 2 and 3 defects. The overall failure rate was also substantially lower in the porous metal group than the structural allograft group; little difference in the infection rates was noted.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - allograft

KW - porous metal

KW - tantalum

KW - knee revision arthroplasty

KW - AORI

KW - knee defects

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25445853

VL - 30

SP - 249

EP - 253

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 129916594