Anthropological Epoches: Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
This article has two objectives. In the first part, I present a critical overview of the extensive anthropological literature that may be deemed "phenomenological." Following this critique, which is built up around a classification into four different varieties of phenomenological anthropology, I discuss the relationship between phenomenological anthropology and the ontological turn (OT). Contrary to received wisdom within the anthropological discipline, I suggest that OT has several things in common with the phenomenological project. For the same reason, I argue, it is not accurate to posit OT and phenomenology as opposing or antagonistic projects, as they are often depicted among critics and advocates of OT alike. On the contrary, I go as far as suggesting, OT may be understood as one of the most concerted attempts anthropology has produced to realize a distinctly anthropological version of Husserl's method of phenomenological bracketing, namely what could be called the ontological epoche.
|Journal||Philosophy of the Social Sciences|
|Number of pages||37|
|Publication status||Published - Dec 2020|
- phenomenological anthropology, ontological turn, epoche, REFLECTIONS, OUTLINE, REALITY, WORD